OC-029 LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR IS FEASIBLE IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE HAD PREVIOUS ABDOMINO-PELVIC SURGERY WITH NO INCREASED RISK OF COMPLICATIONS COMPARED TO OPEN REPAIR

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This study aims to understand whether previous abdomino-pelvic (AP) surgery is a predictor of peri-operative complication in inguinal hernia surgery and if there are discrepancies between laparoscopic or open repairs. Material & Methods All patients operated on within a 5-year period were audited and subcategorised based upon history of AP surgery. Patients were also categorised into laparoscopic and open groups. Data collected included complication rates, recurrence rates and readmission within 30 days. Results 205 patients underwent repair of 288 hernias. 80 (39%) patients had a history of AP surgery. 32 patients suffered a complication (15.6%). 85% of the repairs were laparoscopic in the AP group vs 96.4% in the non-AP group (p=0.02). Complication rates were 17.5% and 14.4% in the AP group and non-AP group respectively (p=0.55). These included superficial infection (0% vs 2.4%, p=0.16), haematoma (11.3% vs 4.8%, p=0.08), seroma (5.0% vs 4.8%, p=0.95), persisting numbness (0% vs 0.8%, p=0.42), and chronic pain (1.3% vs 0.8%, p=0.75). There were no mesh infections or explantation in either arm. A greater proportion of patients in AP group required overnight stays (32.5% vs 21%, p=0.08). At median follow up 1.8 years, recurrence rates were 3.8% vs 1.6%, p=0.33 in AP and non-AP groups respectively. Conclusions Laparoscopic inguinal hernia is feasible in most patients with a history of AP surgery. Compared to open repair, there were no significant differences in recurrence or complication rates in patients with previous AP surgery. Therefore, previous AP surgery should not be a contraindication for laparoscopic repair.