Abstract

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea in infants with Pierre Robin sequence is sleep-position dependent. The influence of sleep position on obstructive events is not established in other infants.MethodsWe re-evaluated ten-year pediatric sleep center data in infants aged less than six months, with polysomnography performed in different sleep positions. We excluded infants with syndromes, genetic defects, or structural anomalies.ResultsComparison of breathing between supine and side sleeping positions was performed for 72 infants at the median corrected age of 4 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 2-8 weeks). Of the infants, 74% were male, 35% were born prematurely, and 35% underwent study because of a life-threatening event or for being a SIDS sibling. Upper airway obstruction was more frequent (obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI), p < 0.001), 95th-percentile end-tidal carbon dioxide levels were higher (p = 0.004), and the work of breathing was heavier (p = 0.002) in the supine than in the side position. Median OAHI in the supine position was 8 h−1 (IQR 4–20 h−1), and in the side position was 4 h−1 (IQR 0-10 h−1).ConclusionsObstructive upper airway events in young infants are more frequent when supine than when sleeping on the side.ImpactThe effect of sleep position on obstructive sleep apnea is not well established in infants other than in those with Pierre Robin sequence.A tendency for upper airway obstruction is position dependent in most infants aged less than 6 months. Upper airway obstruction is more common, end-tidal carbon dioxide 95th-percentile values higher, and breathing more laborious in the supine than in the side-sleeping position.Upper airway obstruction and obstructive events have high REM sleep predominance.As part of obstructive sleep apnea treatment in young infants, side-sleeping positioning may prove useful.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call