Abstract

Soit X une variete projective lisse geometriquement integre sur un corps de nombres. On considere deux obstructions au principe de Hasse sur X : l’obstruction de Brauer–Manin appliquee aux revetements etales de X et l’obstruction de descente sur X. On demontre que la premiere est plus forte que la seconde. On en deduit, grâce a un exemple recent de Poonen, que l’obstruction de descente est insuffisante pour expliquer tous les contrexemples au principe de Hasse. Let X be a smooth, projective and geometrically integral variety over a number field. We consider two obstructions to the Hasse principle on X: the Brauer–Manin obstruction applied to etale covers of X and the descent obstruction on X. We prove that the first one is at least as strong as the second. Combining this with a recent example of Poonen shows that the descent obstruction is not sufficient to explain all counterexamples to the Hasse principle.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call