Abstract

AbstractA set of global observing‐system experiments is run by excluding classes of observations from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) four‐dimensional variational (4D‐Var) data assimilation and forecast system. This indicates how efficiently the observations are used in this particular system. The observing systems tested were mainly TIROS (Television Infra‐Red Observation Satellite) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) radiances, SATellite OBservation (SATOB) atmospheric‐motion winds, radiosondes, aircraft, drifting buoys and Australian pseudo observations (PAOBs). The impact is assessed in both summer and winter 1999, over a total period of six weeks, in terms of the average objective quality of the deterministic forecast of tropospheric wind and geopotential height at medium (5–7 day) and short (1–3 day) ranges. It is shown that the choice of verification method matters in data‐poor areas such as the tropics and the southern hemisphere.Some interesting conclusions can be drawn about the ECMWF 4D‐Var system. Each observing system tested has a notable positive impact on the medium‐range forecast performance. This is not always true at shorter ranges. The TOVS radiances have a large impact on all areas and ranges. Drifting buoys and PAOBs both have some impact in the southern hemisphere. In the northern hemisphere, the relative impact of TOVS, aircraft and radiosondes depends on the area considered. For Europe, the statistical significance of the results is limited, but the most important observing system among those tested appears to be the radiosondes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call