Abstract
In order to improve the reliability of power plants it is important to detect fault as fast as possible. Doing this it is interesting to find the most efficient method. Since modeling of large scale systems is time consuming it is interesting to compare a model-based method with data driven ones. In this paper three different fault detection approaches are compared using a example of a coal mill, where a fault emerges. The compared methods are based on: an optimal unknown input observer, static and dynamic regression model-based detections. The conclusion on the comparison is that observer-based scheme detects the fault 13 samples earlier than the dynamic regression model-based method, and that the static regression based method is not usable due to generation of far too many false detections.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
