Abstract

Abstract. We present observations from the Polar satellite that confirm the existence of two types of depletion layers predicted under southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions in magnetohydrodynamic simulations. The first depletion type occurs along the stagnation line when IMF BX and/or dipole tilt are/is present. Magnetic merging occurred away from the equator (Maynard et al., 2003) and flux pile-ups developed while the field lines drape to the high-latitude merging sites. This high-shear type of depletion is consistent with the depletion layer model suggested by Zwan and Wolf (1976) for low-shear northward IMF conditions. Expected sites for depletion layers are associated with places where IMF tubes of force first impinge upon the magnetopause. The second depletion type develops poleward of the cusp. Under strongly driven conditions, magnetic fields from Region 1 current closure over the lobes (Siscoe et al., 2002c) cause the high-latitude magnetopause to bulge outward, creating a shoulder above the cusp. These shoulders present the initial obstacle with which the IMF interacts. Flow is impeded, causing local flux pile-ups and low-shear depletion layers to form poleward of the cusps. Merging at the high-shear dayside magnetopause is consequently delayed. In both low- and high-shear cases, we show that the depletion layer structure is part of a slow mode wave standing in front of the magnetopause. As suggested by Southwood and Kivelson (1995), the depletions are rarefactions on the magnetopause side of slow-mode density compressions. While highly sheared magnetic fields are often used as proxies for ongoing local magnetic merging, depletion layers are prohibited at merging locations. Therefore, the existence of a depletion layer is evidence that the location of merging must be remote relative to the observation.

Highlights

  • The existence of depletion layers near the magnetopause was first suggested by Midgely and Davis (1963), who reasoned that the magnetic field draping around the magnetopause surface would be constrained to flow in one direction while plasma could flow in all directions

  • In this paper we explore the causes of high magnetic-shear depletion layers by comparing satellite observations with magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulated predictions of the Integrated Space Weather model (ISM) code (White et al, 2001)

  • The presence of the depletion layer supports our interpretation of observations presented in Maynard et al (2003), that magnetic merging was proceeding at high latitudes poleward of the spacecraft

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The existence of depletion layers near the magnetopause was first suggested by Midgely and Davis (1963), who reasoned that the magnetic field draping around the magnetopause surface would be constrained to flow in one direction while plasma could flow in all directions. They showed that the merging efficiency was a factor of 3 larger during AMTE/IRM (Phan et al, 1994) than AMPTE/CCE (Anderson and Fusilier, 1993) observations This result was advanced as a reason why Phan et al (1994) failed to detect systematic depletions during high shear situations. We use ISM simulations to show that under strongly driven conditions with southward IMF, low-magnetic-shear shoulder configurations develop poleward of the cusp These shoulders impede the flow of magnetic flux toward the nose, requiring the field lines to drape around the shoulder before they can merge at the dayside magnetopause. In so doing they create a depletion layer above the cusp. The second type inhibits dayside merging and is a possible mechanism for understanding the saturation of the ionospheric potential under strongly driven conditions (Siscoe et al, 2002b, c)

Measurements
The Integrated Space Weather Prediction Model
Depletion layers with northward IMF
Velocity separator depletion layers
Shoulder depletion layers
Depletion layer structure
Discussion
Velocity-separator depletion layers
Slow mode structure of depletion layers
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call