Abstract
AbstractWe present results from an analyses of cloud cover based on profiles of the attenuated backscatter coefficient from an 8‐year‐long data series (July 2011–April 2019). The observations are carried out in the high Arctic by a ceilometer with a maximum range setting of 7.7 km from the Villum Research Station at Station Nord, Greenland. Results show that the hourly cloud cover turned out to follow a U‐shaped rather than Gaussian‐like distribution. Annual and seasonal cloud cover variation is illustrated. The cloud cover is larger during the autumn and winter as compared to summer and spring. The cloud cover exhibits a substantial variation from year to year without a clear trend. The cloud cover during spring is low and decreasing between 2012 and 2017. The cloud cover during the autumn of 2016 is lowest compared to the other years. The observed cloud cover is compared to the cloud cover provided in the ERA5 reanalysis dataset. The cloud cover for low clouds and medium clouds are combined to represent a total height of 6 km. Both the observed and modelled cloud cover is larger during winter as compared to summer‐time cloud cover. The measured reduction in the cloud cover for the autumn of 2016 is present in the reanalysis data as well but the measured low cloud cover during spring is not apparent in the reanalysis data. Because the cloud cover distribution is U‐shaped rather than of a Gaussian nature, standard metrics are not applicable. We apply a generalized skill score that is developed for contingency tables or joint histograms. Three skill scores were calculated. It was found that for all three methods, skills for the predictability of the cloud cover by the ERA5 modelling is better for winter than summer and is poor during the spring.
Highlights
Knowledge and understanding of Arctic cloud properties is important for climate predictions and weather forecasts but limited because of scarcity of observational data on Arctic clouds in general and especially during the dark winter season
We present results from an analyses of cloud cover based on profiles of the attenuated backscatter coefficient from an 8-year-long data series (July 2011–April 2019)
The observations of the cloud cover at Station Nord exhibit a minimum during spring and reach a maximum during the autumn; this is in overall agreement with variation of the cloud cover that is reported from other observatories in the high Arctic
Summary
Knowledge and understanding of Arctic cloud properties is important for climate predictions and weather forecasts but limited because of scarcity of observational data on Arctic clouds in general and especially during the dark winter season. This has resulted in the use of applications that are based on skill scores (Mace et al, 1998; Miller et al, 1999; Palm et al, 2005; Wilkinson et al, 2008) These methods are based on expressing the number of joint occurrences of observed and predicted cloud cover that is greater or less than a prescribed threshold value in a contingency table. Ð9Þ where x is a number that is derived from a function that reflects the agreement between the observed and modelled cloud cover, xr is the value that would be obtained from a random prediction and xp from a perfect prediction It can be seen from Equation (9) that S = 1 for a perfect prediction and S = 0 for a prediction without any skill. The hit rate is ≈0.57 for both overcast and clear sky conditions, and much less, ≈0.09 for conditions of broken clouds
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
