Abstract
Occupational studies in three countries have related quantitative estimates of arsenic exposure to lung cancer risks. Mine exposures in China appear to incur a higher relative risk than arsenic exposures elsewhere. All of the studies with quantitative data are consistent with a supralinear dose-response relationship. Two studies are also consistent with a linear relationship over an elevated background risk of lung cancer among arsenic-exposed workers. Neither toxicokinetic mechanisms nor confounding from age, smoking, or other workplace carcinogens that differ by exposure level appear likely to explain this curvilinearity. Plausible explanations include (i) synergism (with smoking) which varies in magnitude according to the level of arsenic exposure, (ii) long-term survivorship in higher exposure jobs among the healthier, less susceptible individuals, (iii) exposure estimate errors that were more prominent at higher exposure levels as a result of past industrial hygiene sampling or worker protection practices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
