Abstract

The study sought to compare the naturally occurring behaviour of psychiatric patients within a traditional mental hospital ward and a general hospital psychiatric unit. Direct behavioural observations were undertaken to determine the pattern of behaviour exhibited by patients, the amount of time spent in interaction, with whom interaction took place and the content of that interaction. Data were reliably collected by trained observers, using a 10 category behaviour scale. Within each setting 10 psychotic patients, matched for age, sex and diagnosis, were the subjects and 30 min of behaviour was recorded for each subject. Observations revealed that patients in the mental hospital exhibited more disturbed behaviour, and spent less time in interaction, than did those in the general hospital unit. However, the amount of time patients spent interacting with staff was comparable in the two settings, despite marked differences in staffing levels. Analysis of the content of interaction that did occur indicated that the manner in which staff responded to patients' behaviour was not consistent with the application of a behavioural engineering approach to the modification of abnormal behaviour. While staff in both settings were indiscriminate in the way in which they responded to appropriate and inappropriate patient behaviour, a rather more punitive style of interaction was observed in the mental hospital environment. It is concluded that, from a behavioural perspective, neither setting achieved an optimum therapeutic environment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call