Observations on patterns of granular fertiliser deposition beside hedges and its likely effects on the botanical composition of field margins

Abstract

SummaryPatterns of granular fertiliser deposition differed markedly between a pneumatic boom applicator and a spinning disk machine, both of which were tractor‐mounted. The pneumatic applicator gave relatively even distribution across the boom width. A spinning disk gave more variable deposition and significant amounts were spread further than the expected 12 m overlapping pattern. When operating with a deflector plate on the spinning disk, significant amounts of fertiliser were also spread further than the expected 6 m. However, when operating next to a hedge, there was evidence of fertiliser concentration at the base of the hedge and prevention of granules passing through to adjacent habitat. A peak concentration of up to 150 kg ha‐1 of fertiliser was deposited at the hedge/field edge interface.In a tray experiment on seedling competition and establishment, there was no evidence of nitrogen fertiliser effects, at rates found in the field, on early plant establishment or species diversity. However, in a competition experiment with established plants of four grass species grown in pots, the nitrophilous species Bromus sterilis was able to increase growth at increasing nitrogen level, at the expense of slow‐growing Brachypodium sylvaticum and Anthoxanthum odoratum. Whilst hedges may buffer fertiliser contamination of habitats adjacent to agricultural fields, deposition of concentrated nitrogen fertiliser beside the hedge is likely to encourage the growth of nitrophilous plant species. In the short term, this may not affect botanical composition or diversity, but to reduce the likely long‐term adverse effects of fertiliser misplacement, we recommend that farmers are encouraged to use pneumatic fertiliser applicators and to introduce vegetation buffer strips at field edges.