Abstract

AbstractAlluvial river channels respond to changes in sediment supply by adjusting their geometry. Landslide sediment delivery and geomorphic response of river channels during floods are poorly understood and rarely examined in tropical settings. We investigate the impact of landslides on channel geomorphic changes during an extreme typhoon‐induced flood event in the Philippines, specifically the complex geomorphic response of the Antamok River to Typhoon Mangkhut in September 2018, which triggered >500 landslides in the Ambalanga catchment. The catchment has a legacy of anthropogenic modifications, such as extensive small‐scale (artisanal) mining and tailings storage facilities (TSFs) from large‐scale mining activities.We use a novel mix of mapping and computational modelling approaches to test the hypothesis that landslide sediment delivery is a major control on channel geomorphic change. Pre‐ and post‐event imagery show that the overall active channel area increased by 35.9% and the mean active channel width increased by 9.1 m. Spatially, we find no clear relationship between landslide sediment input or unit stream power and channel width geomorphic change, with longitudinal changes in active channel width complicated by TSFs. Multi‐phase modelling using r.avaflow revealed how landslide sediment delivery and TSFs interacted with the flow to generate the observed patterns of channel change. The model simulated channel incision in the upper parts of the catchment (up to 0.78 m) and deposition in the TSFs (up to 1.73 m).Our findings demonstrate that well‐established methods (e.g., stream power threshold) fail to fully explain channel width geomorphic changes, particularly for anthropogenically altered catchments. Integrating techniques, such as landslide mapping and multi‐phase computational modelling improves understanding of sediment supply's role in channel width change during extreme events. Numerical simulations also demonstrate that conventional assumptions of increased erosion and deposition with rising flow discharge are inaccurate with large sediment input, highlighting instead the effectiveness of multi‐phase models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.