Abstract
Melanomas can arise from naevi or appear de novo. The frequency or the effect of their origin on prognosis is still debated. Mitotic rate (MR) and ulceration of melanomas have been proposed as further new prognostic indexes. To determine the different prognostic factors in melanomas de novo and melanomas from pre-existing naevi and whether these two melanoma groups have different MR or presence of ulceration. All patients with confirmed primary melanomas observed in our clinic from 1996 to July 2013 were included. The distinction between the two groups of melanomas was histologically based. We compared Breslow's thickness, the number of mitosis/mm(2) and the presence of ulceration between the naevus-associated melanoma and de novo melanoma group. Of the 873 melanomas, 626 (71.8%) have a de novo melanoma, 247 (28.2%) a naevus-associated melanoma. Breslow's thickness was not significantly different in the two groups (0.77 ± 1.47 mm vs. 0.59 ± 1.35 mm). The number of patients with presence of ulceration and MR ≥1 mitosis/mm(2) was not significantly different in the two groups (19.6% vs. 16.3%). In thicker melanomas (Breslow's thickness ≥ 1 mm), the number of patients with ≥6 mitosis/mm(2) was significantly higher (26.6% vs. 7.9%; P < 0.05) in the de novo melanoma group. When mitosis ≥ 1 mm/mm(2) , the results obtained do not show a better or worse prognosis based on Breslow's thickness, ulceration and MR in melanomas associated with naevus vs. melanomas de novo. When ≥6 mitosis/mm(2) are considered, the number of patients in the de novo melanoma group with thick melanoma is highly more represented. The debate about the cut-off value of mitosis ≥1 mm(2) is open.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.