Observational study of complex abdominal wall reconstruction using porcine dermal matrix: How have outcomes changed over 14 years?

Abstract

BackgroundOur center has adopted many evidence-based practices to improve outcomes for complex abdominal wall reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix. This study analyzed outcomes over time using porcine dermal matrix in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. MethodsProspective, tertiary hernia center data was examined for patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix. Early (2008–2014) and Recent (2015–2021) cohorts were defined by dividing the study interval in half. Multivariable analyses of wound complications and recurrence were performed. ResultsComparing 117 Early vs 245 Recent patients, both groups had high rates of previously repaired hernias (76.1% vs 67.4%; P = .110), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention class 3 or 4 wounds (76.0% vs 66.6%; P = .002), and very large hernia defects (320 ± 317 vs 282 ± 164 cm2; P = .640). Recent patients had higher rates of preoperative botulinum injection (0% vs 21.2%; P < .001), posterior component separation (15.4% vs 35.5%; P < .001), and delayed primary closure (23.1% vs 38.8%; P < .001), but lower rates of concurrent panniculectomy (32.3% vs 27.8%; P = .027) and similar anterior component separation (29.1% vs 18.2%; P = .060). Most mesh was placed preperitoneal (74.4% vs 93.3%; P < .001). Recent patients had less inlay (9.4% vs 2.1%; P < .01) and other mesh locations as fascial closure rate increased (88.0% vs 95.5%; P < .001). Over time, there was a decrease in wound complications (42.1% vs 14.3%; P < .001), length of stay (median [interquartile range]:8 [6–13] vs 7 [6–9]; P = .003), and 30-day readmissions (32.7% vs 10.3%; P < .001). Hernia recurrence decreased (10.3% vs 3.7%; P = .016) with mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 3.2 and 1.7 ± 1.7 years, respectively.Respective multivariable models(odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) demonstrated an increased risk of wound complications with diabetes (2.65, 1.16–5.98; P = .020), panniculectomy (2.63, 1.21–5.73; P = .014), and anterior component separation (5.1, 1.98–12.9; P < .001), with recurrence risk increased by wound complication (3.8, 1.4-2-7.62; P = .032). ConclusionPorcine dermal matrix in complex abdominal wall reconstruction performs well with low recurrence rates. Internal assessment and implementation of evidence-based practices improved outcomes such as length of stay, wound complications, and recurrence rate.