Obliterative portal venopathy: A comparative study of 184 cases of extrahepatic portal obstruction and 469 cases of idiopathic portal hypertension

Abstract

Abstract A total of 184 cases of extrahepatic portal obstruction (EHPO), mostly demonstrated by intraoperative portography and studied at 17 institutes during the period 1957–1983, were compared with 469 cases of idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) similarly studied. Of the cases of EHPO, there were 101 males and 83 females; 93 were under 20 years of age and the average age was 25.9 years (i.e. much younger than that of IPH cases). There were two age peaks, one before age 19 years and the other at age 40–49 years. One out of three adult cases had a history of abdominal surgery, but otherwise the aetiologic factor was difficult to elicit. Bleeding was the initial symptom in the majority, and splenectomy and haematological findings of hypersplenism were less pronounced compared with IPH. Liver function tests were almost always normal. The liver appeared normal macroscopically in 69% and histologically in 35%. The changes seen in the remainder were similar to those in IPH; they were less frequent in young patients than in cases above age 20 years. Compared with IPH, the wedged hepatic venous pressure in patients with EHPO was lower and the gradient from the portal venous pressure was greater. It is concluded that extrahepatic portal obstruction is less common compared with IPH in Japan, and that there are cases particularly among adults that present clinicopathological features very similar to those of IPH. It is unclear at present whether these two disorders represent two different disease entities, or whether they represent one disorder with differences in the site of involvement along the portal vein system.