Abstract

With an ageing world population, preservation of older adults’ health and quality of life (QoL) is paramount. Due to lower levels of physical functionality, older adults are particularly susceptible to local environment influences, especially those living alone and lacking family support. Using generalised additive mixed models, we examined associations and confounder-adjusted associations between objectively-measured neighbourhood attributes and QoL domains in 909 Hong Kong Chinese elderly community dwellers. Most examined neighbourhood attributes were not associated with QoL in the whole sample. Neighbourhood residential and entertainment density was curvilinearly and/or linearly related to specific QoL domains. Number of parks was negatively associated with social QoL and having well-treed parks with higher levels of social QoL. Older adults living alone in neighbourhoods with poor access to destinations and few activities in parks showed lower environmental and/or social QoL than their counterparts. Neighbourhood built environment characteristics do not seem to impact Hong Kong older adults’ physical and psychological QoL. Medium-to-high density, well-ordered neighbourhoods with optimal mixes of well-treed public open spaces and services meeting their daily needs may significantly contribute to social and environmental QoL in this population and appear particularly important to those living alone.

Highlights

  • According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), quality of life (QoL) refers to people’s perceptions of their status in life in relation to their goals, standards and concerns, and within the context of their culture and value systems

  • The ALECS project used a two-stage sampling method to recruit participants from 124 tertiary planning units (TPUs) stratified by high/low socio-economic status (SES) and walkability to maximise the variation in environmental characteristics

  • The moderating effects of neighbourhood environmental attributes on the associations between living arrangements and QoL are summarised in Table 3, where we report the ranges of values of the environmental attributes for which the associations between living arrangements and QoL were significant at a probability level of 0.05

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), quality of life (QoL) refers to people’s perceptions of their status in life in relation to their goals, standards and concerns, and within the context of their culture and value systems. This concept spans a wide range of aspects of life, including and beyond mere physical and mental health defined as the presence and severity of diseases [1]. The breadth of the WHO’s definition of QoL is reflected in its domain-based QoL scales, the WHOQOL-100. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 876; doi:10.3390/ijerph16050876 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call