Abstract
BackgroundNo studies have examined associations in objectively measured sedentary time between parents and young people using activPAL posture sensors, which provide a more accurate estimate of sedentary time compared to accelerometer-based devices. This study examines patterns and associations of activPAL measured sedentary time and number of sedentary breaks on weekdays and weekend days in preschool (2–4 yrs), primary (5–11 yrs) and secondary school aged children (12–17 yrs) and their parents.Methods51 parents (16 M, 35 F; mean age 39 (+/−8) yrs) and 51 children (28 M, 23 F; mean age 9 (+/−5) yrs) wore an activPAL monitor for 7 days to measure time spent sedentary and number of breaks in sedentary time. Data was assessed by Pearson's correlations and t-tests.ResultsSecondary school children spent a greater percentage of their day sedentary (64.5 (+/−8.5) %) than preschool (57.4 (+/−7.3) %) and primary school children (57.2 (+/−5) %). For the secondary school parent dyad, there were no significant positive associations for time sedentary (r = −0.167, p = 0.494) and percentage of day sedentary (r = −0.247, p = 0.308). For the primary school parent dyad, there were medium, but non-significant positive correlations for time sedentary (r = 0.38, p = 0.146) and percentage of day sedentary (r = 0.363, p = 0.167). For the preschool parent dyad, there were medium—large positive correlations for percentage of waking day sedentary at weekends (r = 0.479, p = 0.083) and number of sedentary breaks (r = 0.648, p = 0.012) at weekends.ConclusionsThere were positive associations in sedentary time between primary school children and their parents, and between preschool children and their parents at the weekend. Thus, interventions aimed at reducing sedentary time of parents and children together, particularly at the weekend for young children, may be effective in these age groups. Secondary school children were more sedentary and had fewer sedentary breaks than younger children, thus interventions should promote breaks in sedentary time as well as reducing total sedentary time in this age group.
Highlights
Sedentary behaviours are defined as waking behaviours that require low energy expenditure (≤1.5 metabolic equivalents) and are performed in a sitting or reclining posture [1]
Background: No studies have examined associations in objectively measured sedentary time between parents and young people using activPAL posture sensors, which provide a more accurate estimate of sedentary time compared to accelerometer-based devices
No studies have examined associations in objectively measured sedentary time between children and adolescents and their parents using activPAL posture sensors, which provide a more accurate estimate of sedentary time compared to accelerometer-based devices
Summary
Sedentary behaviours are defined as waking behaviours that require low energy expenditure (≤1.5 metabolic equivalents) and are performed in a sitting or reclining posture [1]. Data were collected from 12 sites around the world and found that, on average, children spent 8.6 hours/day being sedentary and 54% of children exceeded the 2 hours of recommended screen time a day [3] Research suggests that these high levels of sedentary time in young people may have adverse effects on physical and psychosocial health [5], though most of the current evidence is based on cross-sectional studies and assessment of screen time It is generally thought that a child’s behaviour is heavily influenced by their parent’s behaviour, parental sedentary time may be a key correlate of sedentary time in children and adolescents and an important target for intervention [12]. Several mechanisms may explain potential parent-child associations in sedentary
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
