Abstract

By definition, Building with Nature solutions utilise services provided by the natural system and/or provide new opportunities to that system. As a consequence, such solutions are sensitive to the status of, and interact with the surrounding system. A thorough understanding of the ambient natural system is therefore necessary to meet the required specifications and to realise the potential interactions with that system. In order to be adopted beyond the pilot scale, the potential impact of multiple BwN solutions on the natural and societal systems of a region need to be established. This requires a ‘reality check’ of the effectiveness of multiple, regional-scale applications in terms of social and environmental costs and benefits. Reality checking will help establish the upscaling potential of a certain BwN measure when addressing a larger-scale issue. Conversely, it might reveal to what extent specific smaller-scale measures are suitable in light of larger regional-scale issues. This paper presents a stepwise method to approach a reality check on BwN solutions, based on the Frame of Reference method described in a companion paper (de Vries et al., 2020), and illustrates its use by two example cases. The examples show that a successful pilot project is not always a guarantee of wider applicability and that a broader application may involve dilemmas concerning environment, policy and legislation.

Highlights

  • Building with Nature (BwN) solutions utilise services provided by the natural system and/or provide new opportunities to that system (De Vriend and Van Koningsveld, 2012)

  • This paper presents a stepwise method to approach a reality check on BwN solutions, based on the Frame of Reference method described in a companion paper

  • The cases described illustrate that for BwN solutions to achieve their full potential at the system scale, they need to be based on a thorough understanding of the natural system, plausibly embedded in a large-scale strategy, as well as part of a larger scale co-ordinated policy arrangement, supported by corresponding legislation and regulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Building with Nature (BwN) solutions utilise services provided by the natural system and/or provide new opportunities to that system (De Vriend and Van Koningsveld, 2012). The BwN philosophy is applicable to engineering infrastructure development in a variety of surface water systems (De Vriend et al, 2015, Bridges et al, 2018, Laboyrie et al, 2018), and at different scale levels, from a single project to regional-scale strategies. This means that the system functioning at this larger scale needs to be considered and understood. Where BwN solutions are supposed to fit into such a larger-scale strategy, objective evaluation beyond isolated pilot implementations is required to demonstrate the larger-scale functionality of multiple smaller-scale interventions. Important evaluation criteria are the societal and environmental costs and benefits

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call