Object of Civil Legal Relations

Abstract

Civil legal relations problem has never yet been a subject of special study of legal Georgian literature. This issue is discussed when researching of other categories or specific institutions of common and in connection with them, which leads to heterogeneous understanding of theoretical content of object. There are different opinions about of civil legal In Western civil of civil legal relations is considered as due event, though in certain cases real sector elements are presented as an of civil legal relations that was not given a proper academic assessment. It is to be established, how reasonable is it to use term object of civil legal relations. Problematic is issue on whether of civil legal relations is an ideal event, real event, or ideal-real event. It is also to be defined, if there exists an objectless civil legal relationship, which gives place to an between legal categories. Clarification of these issues is of great importance from methodological and practical points of view. Relevant is also issue issue of limiting of civil legal relations with criteria of lawfulness, morality and circulation ability. This is associated with legal relations existence - non existence in case of absence of above features a legal obligation and proprietal legal Should be outlined specific characteristics of objects in absolute and relative An of legal relations and an of rights or laws are not identical; this problem is logically related with interrelation of part and whole categories. In addition, of civil legal relations is much broader than of civil circulation. They differ from each other by methodological bases as well. The of legal relations and subject of legal relations shall be separated from each other by real and ideal bases. As theories about of legal relations, general philosopical approach is deficient because it exceeds are of juridical problems; some defects can be seen in monistic theory as well, which admits only one event as of legal The is shown here in nonlegal view as well. According to this understanding, it is interesting to discuss legal mode as an of legal Though is understood by ideal bases here which is important but it is necessary to consider real basis of problem. The pluralist theory contains same deficiencies as monistic theory, since it admits real events as an of legal relations but difference is that pluralistic approach acknowledges any kind of expression of real area as an of legal relations. Thereby gains legal cover by influence of rights and duties and becomes necessary element of civil legal If we consider concept of circulation ability it appears that in Article 7 of Civil Code only of regulative civil legal relations is presented. But civil legal relation arises for purpose of protection too. Civil legal relation implies regulative and protective legal So, construction given by Code meaning that the of private legal relation must be good which isn’t taken from circulation according to law breaks down and circulation ability loses its mandatory status in defying of civil legal Generally of property and relation of obligation converge.