Abstract

Although several nonhuman animals have the ability to recognize and match templates in computerized tasks, we know little about their ability to recall and then physically manufacture specific features of mental templates. Across three experiments, Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana), a species that can use tools in captivity, were exposed to two pre-made template objects, varying in either colour, size (long or short) or shape (I or L-shaped), where only one template was rewarded. Birds were then given the opportunity to manufacture versions of these objects themselves. We found that all birds carved paper strips from the same colour material as the rewarded template, and half were also able to match the size of a template (long and short). This occurred despite the template being absent at test and birds being rewarded at random. However, we found no evidence that cockatoos could carve L-shaped pieces after learning that L-shaped templates were rewarded, though their manufactured strips were wider than in previous tests. Overall, our results show that Goffin cockatoos possess the ability to physically adjust at least the size dimension of manufactured objects relative to a mental template. This ability has previously only been shown in New Caledonian crows, where template matching was suggested as a potential mechanism allowing for the cumulative cultural transmission of tool designs. Our results show that within avian tool users, the ability to recreate a physical template from memory does not seem to be restricted to species that have cumulative tool cultures.

Highlights

  • What shape are a foxs ears? Most people visualize the corresponding image before answering the question (Pearson and Kosslyn 2015)

  • The results suggested that the birds were capable of flexibly recalling and reproducing at least one object property in relative but not absolute proportions to a mental template (Jelbert et al 2018)

  • When inspecting the conditions separately we found that birds produced shorter pieces as the number of trials increased in sessions with the short template (GLMM: estimate = − 0.436, SE ± 0.197, χ2 = 4.292, df = 1, p = 0.038)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most people visualize the corresponding image before answering the question (Pearson and Kosslyn 2015). Internal representations such as images can be stored as ‘templates’ in memory which can be retrieved for visual pattern search and recognition Humans can represent information in multiple ways and use mental templates to actively produce memorized patterns, for example, during mental imagery or mental simulation (Pearson and Kossyln 2015). In non-human animals the ability to recognize information is typically assessed in delayed matching-to-sample tasks using computerized touchscreen designs, where the focus is usually on how long certain animal species can keep specific object features in memory On the other hand, requires the animal to reproduce remembered information via a generative response (Basile 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call