Abstract

Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammals rely on the temporal and amplitude differences between the sound signals arriving at their two ears, as well as on the spectral cues available in the signal arriving at a single ear to localize a sound source. Most mammals rely on passive hearing and are thus limited by the acoustic characteristics of the emitted sound. Echolocating bats emit sound to perceive their environment. They can, therefore, affect the frequency spectrum of the echoes they must localize. The biosonar sound beam of a bat is directional, spreading different frequencies into different directions. Here, we analyse mathematically the spatial information that is provided by the beam and could be used to improve sound localization. We hypothesize how bats could improve sound localization by altering their echolocation signal design or by increasing their mouth gape (the size of the sound emitter) as they, indeed, do in nature. Finally, we also reveal a trade-off according to which increasing the echolocation signal's frequency improves the accuracy of sound localization but might result in undesired large localization errors under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions.

Highlights

  • Determining the location of a sound-emitting source can have a huge influence on an animal’s fitness

  • Our results demonstrate the great potential of using the spatial information generated by the biosonar beam for localization

  • Behavioural results have suggested that the angular localization performance in bats is better when they rely on active biosonar than when they passively listen to sounds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Determining the location of a sound-emitting source can have a huge influence on an animal’s fitness. Because movement usually produces sound, animals (humans included) have developed neural and morphological mechanisms to enable precise sound localization [1,2,3,4]. Localization performance could significantly affect survival such as in the case of localizing the rustling sound of a sneaking predator or a moving prey. 2: 150225 frequency (kHz) (a) (b) (i) (b) (ii) (c). –20 pressure (dB) pressure (dB) pressure (dB) (dB) 125 kHz 65 kHz

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call