Abstract
A categorial semantic domain for objects is presented in order to clarify both aggregation and specialization. Three kinds of specialization are discussed: (1) subtyping (specialization with no side effects and no non-monotonic overriding); (2) monotonic specialization (possibly with side effects but still only with monotonic overriding); and (3) non-monotonic specialization (possibly with side effects and non-monotonic overriding). A sequence of three categories of objects differing only in the morphisms is presented. The first one is used to explain object aggregation (respecting locality through a frame constraint) and the strictest form of specialization (subtyping). The second category is shown to be adequate for explaining specialization with side effects (by relaxing the frame constraint). Finally, the third category supports also non-monotonic overriding, by adopting as morphisms suitable partial morphisms of the second one. All these categories are complete and cocomplete. Colimits are used for explaining the semantics of aggregation and multiple inheritance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
