Abstract

One of the factors contributing to a seamless visual experience is object correspondence—that is, the integration of pre- and postsaccadic visual object information into one representation. Previous research had suggested that before the execution of a saccade, a target object is loaded into visual working memory and subsequently is used to locate the target object after the saccade. Until now, studies on object correspondence have not taken previous fixations into account. In the present study, we investigated the influence of previously fixated information on object correspondence. To this end, we adapted a gaze correction paradigm in which a saccade was executed toward either a previously fixated or a novel target. During the saccade, the stimuli were displaced such that the participant’s gaze landed between the target stimulus and a distractor. Participants then executed a corrective saccade to the target. The results indicated that these corrective saccades had lower latencies toward previously fixated than toward nonfixated targets, indicating object-specific facilitation. In two follow-up experiments, we showed that presaccadic spatial and object (surface feature) information can contribute separately to the execution of a corrective saccade, as well as in conjunction. Whereas the execution of a corrective saccade to a previously fixated target object at a previously fixated location is slowed down (i.e., inhibition of return), corrective saccades toward either a previously fixated target object or a previously fixated location are facilitated. We concluded that corrective saccades are executed on the basis of object files rather than of unintegrated feature information.

Highlights

  • One of the factors contributing to a seamless visual experience is object correspondence—that is, the integration of pre- and postsaccadic visual object information into one representation

  • Analysis of the gaze correction saccades showed that corrective saccades to an object that had previously been fixated but that had shifted during a saccade had a lower latency (M = 229.3 ms, SD = 26.8) than did corrective saccades to a non-previously-fixated object (M = 238.9 ms, SD = 25.2), t(11) = –2.64, p = .02, η2 =

  • These analyses suggest that saccades to previously fixated object are initiated more slowly, which is in line with well-studied inhibition of return (IOR) effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the factors contributing to a seamless visual experience is object correspondence—that is, the integration of pre- and postsaccadic visual object information into one representation. In a study using the same corrective-saccade paradigm, participants were tasked to remember unrelated color information for a subsequent memory task in addition to performing the gaze correction task (Hollingworth & Luck, 2009). In this dual-task experiment, it was observed that, when the color information in VWM conflicted with the color of the saccade target, the participants made more erroneous corrective saccades and made corrective saccades with longer latencies. If visual search driven by VWM is a process that precedes the execution of a corrective saccade, previously attended objects and locations (through fixation) would affect the latencies of corrective saccades. On the basis of the previous literature, previous fixations could exert two possible influences on corrective saccade latencies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call