Abstract

The influence of body-mass index (BMI) on spinal anesthesia is still controversial, with discrepant results reported in previous studies. To compare spinal anesthesia in obese and non-obese subjects, the anesthesia profiles in patients who underwent spinal anesthesia using intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine were compared. A total of 209 patients undergoing elective total knee replacement arthroplasty (TKRA) surgery under spinal anesthesia were divided into an NO (non-obese) group (BMI < 30 kg/m2, n = 141) and an O (obese) group (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n = 68). Anesthesia was deemed successful if a bilateral T12 sensory block occurred within 15 minutes of intrathecal drug administration, and if the level of sensory block was higher than T12 when the surgery ended. Logistic regression analysis with multiple variables known to influence spinal anesthesia was performed to identify which parameters independently determined the spinal anesthesia outcome. Similar doses of bupivacaine were administered to the NO and O groups. The incidence of anesthesia failure was significantly lower in the O group [n = 43 (30.5%) in the NO group vs. n = 10 (18.9%) in the O group, p = 0.014]. The independent predictors for successful anesthesia in all patients were dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine [odds ratio (OR) 2.12, 95% CI: 1.64–2.73] and obese status (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, OR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.25–6.52). Time to first report of postoperative pain and time to first self-void were significantly longer in the O group. These results suggest that the duration of block with hyperbaric bupivacaine is prolonged in obese patients and obesity is independently associated with spinal anesthesia outcomes, as is bupivacaine dosage. A further study enrolling patients with morbid obesity and using a fixed bupivacaine dosage is required to confirm the effect of obesity on spinal anesthesia.

Highlights

  • The spread of spinal anesthetic drugs has been reported to be variable [1]

  • According to the obesity criteria issued by a panel of experts from the World Health Organization [16], patients with a body-mass index (BMI) < 30.0 kg/m2 were assigned to the non-obese group (NO group, n = 141), and those with a BMI 30.0 kg/m2 were assigned to the obese group (O group, n = 68)

  • The incidence of anesthesia failure was significantly lower in the O group [n = 43 (30.5%) in the NO group vs. n = 10 (14.7%) in the O group, p = 0.014]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The spread of spinal anesthetic drugs has been reported to be variable [1]. The sensory block level in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia can be influenced by numerous patientPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124264 April 21, 2015Influence of Body-Mass Index on Spinal Anesthesia Duration demographic factors including age, gender, height, weight, body-mass index (BMI), spinal anatomy, and lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Previous studies that compared maximal cephalad spread with isobaric local anesthetics have reported positive relationships between obesity and sensory block level [3,4,5,6,15]. This increased spread has been assumed to be due to the reduced CSF volume caused by large amounts of epidural fat or extradural vein distention [9,12]. Recent dose-response studies compared median effective dose (ED50) for successful anesthesia between obese and non-obese patients, reporting no difference [13,14] These previous results were limited mainly to maximal block height, not block duration. Reduced CSF volume might influence the block duration, but there has been no study comparing the block duration between obese and nonobese patients

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call