Abstract
At the operational level, there is a dangerous tendency to coin forms of legal interpretation that limit the recognition of specific rights. Here the judiciary-law relationship is connoted by undue expansionism of the jurisprudence that leads to authoritarian turning points probably generated by special-preventive ideologies not always in line with legal command. And when this happens with reference to rights recognised at European level, also affirmed by the Charter of Values, exegetic freedoms generate insubordination and violation of the obligation of “maximizing” legal protections, leading to an unacceptable single case judgment in violation of the constitutional duty to ensure procedural equality
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
