O39 ASSOCIATION OF DIFFERENT MESH AND MESH FIXATION COMBINATIONS WITH REOPERATION RISK AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC GROIN HERNIA SURGERY. A SWEDISH HERNIA REGISTRY STUDY OF 25,190 TEP AND TAPP REPAIRS

Abstract

Abstract Aim The HerniaSurge guidelines concerning mesh and fixation options in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) groin hernia repair are based on studies focusing on either mesh or fixation. We hypothesized that the value of such recommendations is limited by lacking knowledge on how mesh and fixation interact. The present registry-based nationwide cohort study compared different mesh/fixation combinations regarding relative risks for reoperation after TEP and TAPP. Material and Methods All TEP and TAPP with standard polypropylene (StdPPM) or lightweight (LWM) flat meshes, combined with either tacks, fibrin glue, or no fixation, registered in the Swedish Hernia Registry 2005-2017 were included. Endpoint was reoperation due to recurrence as of December 31, 2018. Multivariable Cox regression rendered relative risk differences between the exposures, expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of 25 190 repairs, 924 (3.7%) were later reoperated for recurrence. The lowest, mutually equivalent, reoperation risks were associated with StdPPM without fixation (HR 1), StdPPM with metal tacks (HR 0.8, CI 0.4-1.4), StdPPM with fibrin glue (HR 1.1, CI 0.7-1.6), and LWM with fibrin glue (HR 1.2, CI 0.97-1.6). LWM correlated otherwise with increased risk, whether without fixation (HR 2.0, CI 1.6-2.6), or affixed with metal (HR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.7), or absorbable tacks (HR 2.4, CI 1.8-3.1). Conclusions With StdPPM, fixation seems not to improve outcomes, despite being costlier. Thus, for this mesh category, we recommend non-fixation. With LWM, we recommend fibrin glue fixation, which was the only LWM alternative on par with non-affixed StdPPM.