O27 Early experience with JAK inhibitor prescribing in the UK: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA)

Abstract

Abstract Background In 2017, a new class of oral disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), were licensed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA): baricitinib and tofacitinib. In the UK, they are approved for use in patients with high disease activity with or without methotrexate, following failure of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs or biologic DMARDs, the latter when rituximab is contraindicated. As a new therapy option, it is currently unclear how and when these drugs are being prescribed in patients with RA. This analysis aims to describe the characteristics of patients starting JAKi and registered with the BSRBR-RA. Methods The BSRBR-RA aims to capture exposure and outcome data in patients with RA receiving biologics, biosimilars and targeted synthetic DMARDs. At the start of therapy, demographic and clinical data, including past treatment data, are collected. Characteristics of all patients receiving a JAKi for the first time with data recorded in the BSRBR-RA up to 31/03/2019 are described. Results To 31/03/2019, 698 patients in the BSRBR-RA have been treated with a JAKi; 596 patients baricitinib and 110 tofacitinib (Table 1). A quarter of patients received a JAKi with no prior biologic exposure; 148 (25%) baricitinib and 16 (15%) tofacitinib. Of these, 15% had a prior malignancy history. Of those with prior biologic exposure, the median number of previous biologics was 3 (IQR 2-4), the majority had prior TNFi (91%) or rituximab (51%), and 50% were receiving concurrent methotrexate. Conclusion To date, more patients have been recruited starting baricitinib than tofacitinib, likely owing to the later licensing of tofacitinib. Two groups are emerging with a quarter of patients receiving JAKi immediately after csDMARDs and a majority as a later stage alternative following multiple biologics. Further recruitment and follow-up patients will allow for analysis of real-world safety and effectiveness, but differences in patient characteristics will need to be considered in any comparative effectiveness analyses. Disclosures L. Kearsley-Fleet None. R. Davies None. K. Watson None. M. Lunt None. K.L. Hyrich Honoraria; AbbVie. Grants/research support; UCB, Pfizer, BMS.