O26 QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ACHALASIA PATIENTS IS THE SAME AFTER PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) AND HELLER MYOTOMY

Abstract

Abstract Aim This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LHM and POEM for esophageal achalasia. Background & Methods Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy (LHM) has been the gold standard of treatment, however per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was recently established as a treatment option for achalasia. A prospective review was performed for all patients submitted to LHM or POEM in our institution from 10/2012 to 06/2018, and have completed a minimum follow up period of 6 months. The diagnostic work-up included gastroscopy, barium study and high-resolution manometry (HRM). All patients underwent a clinical evaluation 6 weeks after treatment and a surveillance gastroscopy in the 1st postoperative year. HRM and pH studies were offered to all patients after 6 months. Standardized questionnaires evaluating Eckardt, GERD and achalasia QoL (Urbach) scores were completed pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 23.0. Repeated measurements analysis of variance was used to compare changes in mean values during follow up and between the two types of surgery. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results Eighty patients (34 women and 46 men) with mean age 42.6 years (16.2) underwent POEM (n=39) or LHM (n=41). QoL score was significantly improved in both study groups (p<0.001) with a similar degree of improvement (p=0.486). Eckardt scores showed a significant improvement in both groups, but repeated measurements analysis revealed a significant effect with time (p=0.038) with a greater improvement in POEM group. Moreover, Eckardt score change was similar between LHM and POEM patients without prior treatments (p=0.724), but in those with prior treatments the improvement trended higher in POEM group (p=0.087). GERD score had a similar and significant decrease in both groups (p=0.439), but in those with prior treatments the improvement was greater in LHM group (p=0.018). There was no significant difference regarding the complication rates for both groups (Clavien-Dindo I-IIIa). Conclusions POEM compares favorably with LHM as treatment for achalasia, as statistically significant improvement in QoL, GERD and Eckardt scores was recorded in both groups. In patients with prior treatments, POEM tends to achieve a greater improvement of Eckardt score and LHM a greater reduction regarding GERD score.