Abstract

Abstract Background Agonal times can vary between organ donors after circulatory death (DCD) following withdrawal of treatment, which leads to variable warm ischaemic damage to pancreas grafts. Currently there is little evidence supporting procurement team standdown times based on donor time to death (TTD). We examined what impact TTD had on pancreas graft outcomes following DCD transplantation. Methods Data were extracted from the UK transplant registry from 2014 to 2022. TTD was defined as withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to donor asystole; asystolic time was the time from asystole to aortic perfusion. Predictors of graft loss were fitted into a Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted restricted cubic spline (RCS) models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results 375 DCD simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients were included. Median TTD was 13-minutes (IQR 10 to 16-minutes), median asystolic time was 13-minutes (IQR 11 to 15-minutes). Increasing TTD was not associated with poorer graft survival (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.41, P=0.901). Increasing asystolic time was significantly associated with worse graft survival in the TTD model (aHR 2.51, 95%CI 1.16-5.43, P=0.020). RCS modelling confirmed there was no relationship between TTD and graft survival, however a non-linear relationship was demonstrated between asystolic time and graft survival. Conclusion We found no evidence that TTD impacts pancreas graft survival in DCD SPK transplantation, however increasing asystolic time was significant predictors of graft loss. Procurement teams should attempt to minimise asystolic time to reduce ischaemic injury to the pancreas graft.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call