O147: Use of the National Consultant Information Programme to evaluate surgical practice in England for rectal prolapse repair, identifying points of variation for improvement and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Using the National Consultant Information Programme (NCIP) tool to extract and analyse data surrounding rectal prolapse repair procedures, to identify key trends and variation. Analysing data across a 4-year period to evaluate how the Covid-19 pandemic impacted current surgical practice. Methods NCIP compiles hospital episode statistics data gathered by NHS analysts. Data is categorised by key metrics including length of stay (LOS), procedure approach, deprivation score and pseudonymised provider. Data is for elective procedures in patients 17+ and has been contextualised by recent available literature. Results Of the 6702 procedures, 65.8% (4413) were carried out in the first time period, 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2020. Abdominal prolapse repair increased from 37.0% of procedures in the first 2 years, to 42.4% in the second period (1st April 2020 to 31st March 2022). Perineal approach decreased from 45.6% of procedures to 41.1% in the second period. 87.7% of patients were female. Most procedures were open (77.7%). Average LOS was 2.5 days and was highest in laparoscopic assisted procedures (5.38), 2.33 in open procedures. From 141 providers, the top 15 did 100-218 procedures each across the 4 years. 24 providers performed 15 or less, while 5 performed only 1 repair. Mortality within 90 days was 0.81% in the first data period and increased to 1.1% in the second. Conclusion Data suggests an impact on procedure numbers due to Covid-19, but not on approach type. Significant observed variation between provider approach and procedure count invites further research into reasons behind this.