Abstract
After the break-up of totalitarian regimes grounded in Marxist ideology, social science tended to avoid the concept of dialectics, or directly excluded it from its scientific agenda. This article tries to elaborate on three questions (concentrating on less familiar or neglected conceptions, e. g. the approaches worked out by Gurvitch, Kojève, Sartre, Stalin, etc.) relating to the development and transformations of dialectic in various sociological conceptions: a) is "dialectical sociology" possible, b) is the concept of "dialectics" redundant (radical and critical sociologies are also "dialectical", c) what are the elementary principles which could or should guide "dialectical studies" of social reality. At the end, the difference between principles of the so-called Lazarsfeldian and radically critical paradigm is demonstrated against the background of empirical research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.