Abstract

The selection of arbitrators is a fundamental phase in the arbitral proceeding. At times, circumstances involving potential arbitrators may raise doubts to the party regarding their impartiality and independence. In this sense, arbitral institutions take on a very relevant role in institutional arbitrations, since they are the ones to decide potential objections to arbitrators. The present article analyses specifically the alteration brought by Article 145, I of the Civil Procedure Code with respect to the grounds of impartiality for judges (“impediment” and “suspicion”) – which are also applicable to arbitrators according to the Brazilian Arbitration Act – and the way in which CBMA – Brazilian Center of Mediation and Arbitration has been interpreting such alteration, also based on IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call