O-044 ICSI in the lab: from vintage to AI

Abstract

Abstract With the advent of in vitro fertilization (IVF) by Patrick Steptoe and Bob Edwards in the late 70s, the first conception outside of the human body resulted in the birth of Louise Brown. Although a terrific success, limitations of IVF surfaced, represented by the unexpected complete fertilization failure with suboptimal or dysfunctional spermatozoa. This prompted curiosity toward individual spermatozoa for a deeper understanding of its role aimed at enhancing the interaction between complementary gametes. Techniques were designed to manipulate the oocytes, such as stripping, partially digesting, or cracking the zona pellucida (ZP). These methods were palliative solutions to overcome fertilization failure and were often plagued by polyspermy. As a result, more direct approaches were implemented to overcome the ZP, such as subzonal injection (SUZI) that although more consistent, was still unable to overcome the shortcomings of dysfunctional spermatozoa. This laid the foundation for the utilization of ICSI that, whilst attempted by some investigators, became popular when Gianpiero Palermo serendipitously inserted one spermatozoon into the ooplasm during SUZI. Consistent fertilization then followed by injecting a cohort of oocytes by ICSI in SUZI cycles, and replacement of these embryos led to 4 pregnancies described in the first clinical ICSI report. To minimize oocyte damage, the procedure was further refined by inducing a deep invagination of the oolemma toward the 9 o’clock position, granting higher chances of post-injection survival. What set apart ICSI from other forms of ART was that any sperm sample, regardless of quality/quantity, would yield fertilization. Indeed, ICSI is the sole insemination method used with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and has therefore revolutionized fertility treatment of azoospermic men. Indeed, even immotile testicular spermatozoa can still fertilize and yield successful pregnancies, albeit at a lower rate than their motile counterpart. Also, for these semen sources, aggressive sperm immobilization was introduced to enhance sperm membrane permeabilization and grant optimal fertilization results. Furthermore, ICSI has transformed the field of reproductive medicine by assisting other reproductive techniques, such as testing embryos for single gene defects to reduce the occurence of sperm DNA contamination, or overcoming the cryostress-induced changes of the ZP during cryopreservation allowing the oocyte to be fertilized at a higher rate. Oocyte cryopreservation now empowers women in their reproductive age to ordain their childbearing future. ICSI has proven to be the ultimate technique to overcome male infertility and has broadened its indication by yielding consistent fertilization and successful pregnancies in most circumstances, ensuring that men have the chance of fathering their own progeny. To date, ICSI is applied in several countries, and in some, is performed as the preferred/sole insemination method contributing to the birth of millions of babies worldwide. Thus far, no concerning differences have been seen in the health of ICSI versus standard IVF offspring, or even naturally conceived. In fact, it has been currently established that young adults of both genders born through ICSI retain their reproductive health. Despite its growing popularity, ICSI does not always succeed but still provides an invaluable platform to deepen our knowledge of gamete biology and helps to investigate/overcome some of the most severe and persistent forms of infertility. For example, combined with assisted gamete treatment, ICSI allows couples plagued by sperm-bound oocyte-activation-deficiency to achieve pregnancy. The need to increase access and curtail costs of reproductive care has led to the testing of automation in ART. This is also occurring with ICSI and to date, different automated modules have been proposed for oocyte denudation, sperm tracking, and robotic ICSI. Concurrently, there has been an interest in experimenting with artificial intelligence in the IVF laboratory to minimize human shortcomings and ensure that the best spermatozoon is chosen.