O-043 Con

Abstract

Abstract Dual and/or double trigger improve IVF success - CON The improvement of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes remains a pivotal area of reproductive medicine research, with the dual trigger approach emerging as a significant innovation. This con abstract explores the scientific basis, methodology, and outcomes associated with the dual trigger strategy, juxtaposed with conventional triggering methods in IVF protocols. The dual trigger, incorporating both Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), has been posited to improve oocyte maturation, retrieval-, and live birth rates. By scrutinizing recent studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses, this debate aims to delineate the efficacy, safety, and application scope of this approach. Initial investigations into the dual trigger method have highlighted its potential to ameliorate oocyte quality and maturity, which are crucial determinants of IVF success. The mechanism underlying this improvement involves the simultaneous activation of LH (Luteinizing Hormone) and FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone) receptors, enhancing follicular response and oocyte developmental competence. Studies have demonstrated an increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved, attributed to the more synchronized and comprehensive follicular stimulation afforded by the dual trigger. This augmentation in oocyte quality and quantity directly correlates with enhanced embryo development profiles, and higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Furthermore, the dual trigger method has shown promise in reducing the incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS), a severe complication of IVF treatments. By leveraging the luteolytic effects of GnRHa, this strategy minimizes the risk associated with exogenous hCG administration, thus offering a safer alternative for patients predisposed to OHSS. The application of the dual trigger in specific patient cohorts, such as those with PCOS or poor ovarian responders, has been underlined, indicating its potential for personalized reproductive medicine. However, the implementation of the dual trigger strategy is not without challenges. Variability in patient response necessitates a highly individualized approach, with precise dosing and timing adjustments to optimize outcomes. The existing literature presents a heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome measures, which complicates the direct comparison of dual trigger efficacy against traditional methods. Furthermore, the long-term safety and potential impacts on offspring warrant further investigation, given the recent adoption of this approach. In conclusion, the dual trigger strategy may offer significant benefits in enhancing IVF outcomes. Its potential to improve oocyte maturity and quality could increase the number of retrievable oocytes and reduce the incidence of OHSS. However, it is important to acknowledge that, while the GnRH agonist trigger combined with a freeze-all strategy eliminates the risk of OHSS in women with PCOS, the dual trigger approach followed by fresh embryo transfer does not. Further research is imperative to refine its application, understand its mechanisms fully, and establish comprehensive guidelines for its use. The promise of the dual trigger approach underscores the importance of continuous innovation and evidence-based practices in enhancing the efficacy and safety of IVF treatments.