Abstract

Despite the interest in increasing the consumption of fruit and vegetables in the UK, the total average consumption is still below the recommended intakes. Evidence indicates that the UK government’s “five-a-day” policy has not been effective in reaching its goal. The results of fiscal policies (e.g., subsidies) to increase fruit and vegetable consumption are uncertain due to complex substitutions done by consumers amongst overall food choice. The goal of the present study was to estimate the prices (i.e., shadow prices) at which consumers can increase their intake of fruits and vegetables by 10% (higher than that achieved by the “five-a-day” policy) without changing the overall taste of the diet (utility). We estimated the ex-ante effect of increasing the UK’s fruit and vegetable consumption by 10% on household nutrient purchases and greenhouse gas emissions. The required changes in prices were estimated by extending the model of consumer behaviour under rationing. The model combines consumption data, demand elasticities estimated from home scan data, and nutrient coefficients for 20 foods consumed in the UK. Our results suggest that to increase vegetable and fruit consumption by 10% (under the current preferences), their prices should decline by 21% and 13%, respectively. However, there is a trade-off between nutrition and environmental goals; total average household caloric purchase declined by 11 kcal, but greenhouse gas emissions increased by 0.7 CO2-eq kg/kg of food.

Highlights

  • The implication is that these food groups are less responsive to price changes [56,57,58] and that any policy aimed at increasing consumption must be huge to have a significant impact [59]

  • Despite the 8.2% increase in fruit and vegetable consumption between 2003 and 2006 due to the UK government’s “five-a-day” policy, fruit and vegetable consumption was on the decline soon after 2006

  • 10% without changing the overall taste of their diet

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Dietary choices have been named as one of the leading global cause of poor population and environmental health [1,2]. Environmental problems associated with unsustainable diets and their implications on production include climate change, water pollution, and loss of habitats and biodiversity [1]. Health-related problems include noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes [3]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call