Abstract

Environment and diet are key factors which shape the microbiome of organisms. There is also a disparity between captive and wild animals of the same species, presumably because of the change in diet. Being able to reverse the microbiome to the wild type is thus particularly important for the reintroduction efforts of Critically Endangered animals. The Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus) is a suitable model, being kept in the thousands within rescue centres throughout Southeast Asia. With next-generation sequencing, we show how a naturalistic diet impacts the gut microbiome of captive slow lorises (Primates: Nycticebus). A comparison of the microbiome of wild animals with captive animals that had been fed a standard captive or improved diet reveals strong microbiome differences between wild and captive animals; however, diet changes failed to alter the microbiome of captive populations significantly. Bifidobacterium was the most abundant genus in wild animals (46.7%) while Bacteroides (11.6%) and Prevotella (18.9%) were the most abundant in captive animals fed the captive and improved diets, respectively. Correlation analyses of nutrients with microbial taxa suggest important implications in using nutrition to suppress potential pathogens, with soluble fibre and water-soluble carbohydrates both being associated with opposing microbiome profiles. The improved diet significantly increased microbe diversity, which exemplifies the importance of high fibre diets; however, wild individuals had lower diversity, which contradicts recent studies. Detection of methanogens appeared to be dependent on diet and whether the animals were living in captivity or in the wild. This study highlights the potential of nutrition in modulating the microbiome of animals prior to release. Unexpectedly, the results were not as significant as has been suggested in recent studies.

Highlights

  • Study of the feeding ecology of free-ranging animals has been conducted using a range of methods including proportion of feeding time[1], faecal sampling[2], ingestion rate[3] and more recently metagenomics[4] and faecal microbiome research[5,6]

  • The primary aim of this study was to compare the gut microbiomes of wild Nycticebus spp. with those of rescue-centre animals. We looked at their microbiome composition on a typical sanctuary-fed diet ( “typical diet”), and again after a diet change reflecting a nutrient intake closer to wild congeners ( “improved diet”), to determine if the microbiome composition shifts to resemble the wild individuals more closely after a dietary change

  • A subsequent analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix showed that these differences were statistically significant (p-value = 0.001, R-value = 0.3944, based on 999 permutations)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Study of the feeding ecology of free-ranging animals has been conducted using a range of methods including proportion of feeding time[1], faecal sampling[2], ingestion rate[3] and more recently metagenomics[4] and faecal microbiome research[5,6]. Www.nature.com/scientificreports understanding of the microbiome grows, it may become possible to predict the health state of an animal, especially when comparing with wild individuals of the same species. Knowing how microbial communities respond to host health status could become a valuable tool in assessing which individuals are more suitable for translocation back into their natural habitat from a captive setting. Such information may be even more vital in the tropics, where rescue centres with limited budgets often provide inappropriate diets to some of the world’s most threatened species[14]. There may be a preference for Fabaeceae, followed by Anacardiaceae and Combretaceae trees; this may just be due to more trees within these families producing gum[38]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call