Nursing insights on the effectiveness of automated pupillometry in two distinct pediatric intensive care units

Abstract

PurposeAutomated pupillometry (AP) facilitates objective pupillary assessment. In this study, we aimed at assessing nursing perspective about the utility of AP in neurocritically ill children to understand acceptance and usage barriers to guide development of a standardized use protocol. MethodsWe conducted a web-based, cross-sectional, anonymous, Google™ survey of nurses at two independent pediatric ICUs which have been using AP over last four years. The survey included questions related to user-friendliness, barriers, acceptance, frequency of use, and method of documenting AP findings. ResultsA total of 31 nurses responded to the survey. A total of 25 nurses (80.6%) used the automated pupillometer and 19 (61.3%) nurses preferred to use the automated pupillometer on critically ill intubated patients. Respondents rated the pupillometer a median [IQR] frequency of use of 7/10 [4–9] and a mean user-friendliness of 8/10 [7–10]. Barriers to pupillometer use included pupillometer unavailability, technical issues, lack of perceived clinical significance, and infection control. ConclusionNurses have widely adopted the use of automated pupillometer in the PICU especially for critically ill intubated patients and rate it favorably for user-friendliness. Barriers against its use include limited resources, infection concerns, technical issues, and a lack of perceived clinical significance and training. Implementation of standardized PICU protocol for AP usage in critically ill children, may enhance the acceptance, increase usage and aid in objective assessments. Practice implicationsThese findings can be used to create a standardized protocol on implementing automated pupillometry in the PICU for critically ill children.