Abstract

Background: In the UK gout management is suboptimal, only 40% of patients receiving urate-lowering therapy (ULT), usually without titration to a target serum urate (SU) level. Nurses successfully manage many diseases in primary care. This trial compared nurse-led care to ongoing usual (general practitioner-led) care for people with gout. Methods: Research nurses were trained in best practice management of gout, including full individualised patient information and engagement in shared decision-making. Adults with acute gout in the previous year were randomised (1:1) to nurse-led or continuing usual care in the community. Assessments were at baseline, one and two years. The primary outcome was percentage of participants achieving SUA<360μmol/L at two years. Secondary outcomes were attack frequency in year two, presence of tophi, quality of life (SF-36) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on intention to treat with multiple imputation. Findings: Of 517 participants, 255 were assigned nurse-led care and 262 usual care. Comparing nurse-led to usual care groups at two years: 96% versus 56% were on ULT with 79% versus 10% taking allopurinol >300mg/day (all p 2 gout attacks respectively (RR 0•33, 0•19-0•57). The cost per QALY gained for the nurse-led intervention was £5066 at two years, and modelled to be £286 at three years and cost-saving at five years. Interpretation: Nurse-led gout care is clinically effective and also cost-effective compared to usual care. These findings illustrate the benefits of patient education and engagement in gout management, and reaffirm the importance of a treat-to-target ULT strategy to improve patient-centred outcomes. Trial Registration Number: National Clinical Trials Registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov ref: NCT01477346). Funding: Arthritis Research UK fully funded the study (Award 19703). Declaration of Interest: MD and AA have received research funding from AstraZeneca for a PI-led “sons of gout” study; MD has received consultation fees from AstraZeneca, Grunenthal and Mallinckrodt; WZ has received consultation fees from AstraZeneca and Grunenthal. Other authors have no conflict of interest. Ethical Approval: It was approved by East Midlands Nottingham Research Ethics Committee (12/EM/0044) and registered with the National Clinical Trials Registry.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call