Abstract
We review inconsistencies in expressions which are used for exciton distribution functions in precompound decay models utilizing the Ericson type of partial state density. We then compare results of one formulation, the hybrid model, with and without corrected distribution functions for the second hierarchy of configurations. Results are shown for93Nb (n, n′) and (n, p) reactions at 14.7, 45 and 90 MeV incident nucleon energies. The corrected distribution functions change hybrid model predictions by less than 10% for angle integrated spectra, but certain cases are discussed for which the improved treatment should be used due to larger errors from the use of the Ericson expression.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.