Abstract

Abstract During the fracturing treatment, fracturing fluid is pumped to generate fractures and then followed with a large amount of proppant to provide enough conductivity for reservoir fluid to flow to the wellbore. The ultimate proppant distribution in the fracture system directly impacts well productivity and production decline rate. However, it is very challenging to predict how far proppants can go and where they will settle because of the complexity of the fracture system. Previous modeling and experimental studies were usually based on simple proppant settling velocity models and limited only to planar fracture cases. In a recent numerical study, proppant transport in different complex fracture geometries was modeled. However, the fracture walls in the model were considered to be perfectly smooth. In this study, proppant transport in complex fracture geometries with different wall roughnesses was investigated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model, in which the interaction between proppant particles, the carrying fluid phase, and the rough fracture wall was fully coupled. A planar fracture case with smooth fracture wall was first investigated using a CFD model and benchmarked with results from commercial software. The CFD models were then used to simulate the proppant transport in T-junction and crossing-junction scenarios with different fracture wall roughnesses, which are often seen in unconventional reservoir fracture systems. The results from the CFD models indicate that proppant transport within complex fracture geometries is significantly affected by fracture wall roughness. Rough fracture wall can exert resistant drag force to proppant particles and carrying fluids and hence influence the proppant transport behavior and particle distribution. It is found rough fracture wall decreases both proppant horizontal transport speed and vertical settling speed which can lead to a better vertical coverage of proppant particles in the fracture. However, more pumping energy and time are required to transport the proppant particles to the same fracture length with rough fracture surfaces compared to smooth fracture surfaces. Studies on proppant density show light weight proppant has a better vertical distribution in fractures with rough walls due to more pronounced drag force effect. With high viscous carrying fluids, proppant in both smooth and rough fractures can transport further at the same transport time. Proppant transport models developed in this work fully incorporate the interaction between proppant particles, carrying fluid dynamics, and rough fracture surfaces. This study extends the current understanding of proppant distribution in complex fracture geometries and helps optimize hydraulic fracturing design to improve unconventional well production performance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call