Abstract

The phase field method is developed to solve free boundary problems (e.g., solid-liquid phase change) without tracing phase interface positions in microscope and mesoscope based on the Ginzburg–Landau theory. Besides, different from the classical Stefan problem, surface tension allowing for the possibility of undercooling (or superheating) effect is introduced for the more realistic physics in the phase field method. In the present study, a phase field model is established and a feasibility study of the phase field model on the macro scale is done through two classical problems: the conduction solid-liquid phase change problem and the convection melting problem. Some results are obtained and model validation is carried out by comparing the results with the Neumann solutions and the classical correlations, respectively. It is found that the results obtained by the phase field model agree well with those of the benchmark solutions on the whole, but some differences, for example, delay of interface moving and undercooling (or superheating) effect, exist if the effect of surface tension is obvious. It's concluded that the phase field method is a reliable method to simulate more realistic solid-liquid phase change problems no matter whether natural convection is considered or not on the macro scale.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.