Abstract
To achieve low nitrogen oxide (NO x) emissions and combustion reliability, the variation in the geometry of the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system should be optimized. However, the layout process essentially fixes the position of a conventional EGR system, and modifying the intake manifold geometry tends to be economically unjustifiable for a commercial engine. In the present study, two types of EGR system, namely ‘linked single’ and ‘individual’ EGR systems, are proposed and their performances are evaluated numerically. Parametric studies were performed using a three-dimensional numerical model to assess the mixing uniformity of the intake air and EGR gases. The distribution of the mixed gases into the four runners, which force the mixed gases into the four combustion cylinders, is predicted. Three different geometries of the EGR system are considered: single, side-feed individual, and top-feed individual configurations. These geometries reflect the means by which the EGR gases are supplied into the four cylinders. These three configurations are called cases A, B, and C respectively, and their corresponding detailed geometries are identified as A1 to A9, B1 to B17, and C1 to C10, which give a total of 36 computational runs. It was found that case A5 with a hole angle of 60° yielded the most optimal operating mixing and distribution condition. In general, the single systems were found to be superior to the individual systems, among which the top-feed system tended to be slightly more advantageous for mixing than the side-feed individual system owing to the symmetric supply of the top-feed system. The flow of the throttle-valve system, which controls the mass flowrate of the intake air, was used as the validation case; Hyundai-Kia Motor Co. provided the experimental data, which were compared with the computational results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.