Numerical solutions to hyperbolic Maxwell quasi-variational inequalities in Bean-Kim model for type-II superconductivity

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the finite element analysis for the Bean-Kim model governed by the full 3D Maxwell equations. Describing type-II superconductivity at the macroscopic level, this model leads to a challenging coupled system consisting of the Faraday equation and a hyperbolic quasi-variational inequality (QVI) of the second kind with $L^1$-type nonlinearity, that arises explicitly from the magnetic field dependency in the critical current. With the involved Maxwell coupling in the 3D $\H(\curl)$-setting, the hyperbolic QVI character poses the primary challenge in the numerical investigation. Two mixed finite element methods based on implicit Euler and leapfrog time-stepping are proposed. On the one hand, the implicit Euler method results in a nonstandard system of curl-curl elliptic QVI with a first-order curl-type nonlinearity. Though the well-posedness of this system is guaranteed, its numerical realization is not straightforward and requires the use of a two-stage iteration process of high computational complexity. On the other hand, by approximating the electric and magnetic fields at two different time step levels, the leapfrog method turns out to be more suitable as it naturally eliminates the notorious QVI structure. More importantly, utilizing suited subdifferential and optimization techniques, we are able to prove an efficiently computable explicit formula for its exact solution in terms of the electric field, which makes its numerical computation substantially more favorable than the Euler method. As further advantages, the leapfrog method applies to broad scenarios involving low regular data of bounded variation (BV) in time for both the applied current source and the temperature distribution. Through nonstandard technical arguments tailored to the BV data, our analysis proves the conditional stability and, eventually, the uniform convergence of the proposed leapfrog method. This paper is closed by 3D numerical tests showcasing the reasonable and efficient performance of the proposed numerical solution.