Abstract

Heat equation is a partial differential equation used to describe the temperature distribution in a heat-conducting body. The implementation of a numerical solution method for heat equation can vary with the geometry of the body. In this study, a three-dimensional transient heat conduction equation was solved by approximating second-order spatial derivatives by five-point central differences in cylindrical coordinates. The stability condition of the numerical method was discussed. A MATLAB code was developed to implement the numerical method. An example was provided in order to demonstrate the method. The numerical solution by the method was in a good agreement with the exact solution for the example considered. The accuracy of the five-point central difference method was compared with that of the three-point central difference method in solving the heat equation in cylindrical coordinates. The solutions obtained by the numerical method in cylindrical coordinates were displayed in the Cartesian coordinate system graphically. The method requires relatively very small time steps for a given mesh spacing to avoid computational instability. The result of this study can provide insights to use appropriate coordinates and more accurate computational methods in solving physical problems described by partial differential equations.

Highlights

  • In science and engineering, partial differential equations are used to express how some quantity varies with position and time [1]

  • One purpose of this paper is to present finite difference discretization of transient three-dimensional heat equation in cylindrical coordinates and to obtain more accurate solution by a higher-order finite difference method with a computer program

  • This paper presented the five-point central difference method to solve the three-dimensional transient heat conduction equation in cylindrical coordinates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Partial differential equations are used to express how some quantity varies with position and time [1]. Finite difference discretizations in polar or cylindrical coordinates have been used by authors to solve partial differential equations. Iyengar and Manohar [10] used the fourth-order difference method for the solution of Poisson’s equation in cylindrical coordinates. They extended the method to solve heat equation in two-dimensional with polar coordinates and threedimensional with cylindrical coordinates. Shiferaw and Mittal [11] solved three dimensional Poisson’s equation with the finite difference method in cylindrical coordinates. One purpose of this paper is to present finite difference discretization of transient three-dimensional heat equation in cylindrical coordinates and to obtain more accurate solution by a higher-order finite difference method with a computer program. The other purpose is to display the solution results graphically in the Cartesian coordinate system for the better visualization

Finite Difference Discretization of Heat Equation
Stability Analysis
A Test Problem and Solutions
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call