Abstract

Numerical Simulation of the Laval Annular Mechanical Foam Breaker for Foam Drilling

Highlights

  • Though air foam drilling technology has been widely used in drilling oil and gas wells, which has proved its efficiency in numerous situations where serious problems were encountered such as in fractured formations and depleted or high permeable zones, the main challenge is that after returning to the surface the foam remains stable and requires a long period of time to dissipate back to the volume of the original liquid (Teichrob and Manuel, 1997; Cao et al, 2009)

  • Mechanical foam breaker is preferable to chemical methods, avoiding problems such as changing the chemical and physical properties of the foam system which pollute the foam surfactant and reduce its foamability that the foam drilling fluid cannot be reused, or adverse effects on environment seen when foaming is controlled by the addition of antifoam agents (Pelton, 2002)

  • On close observation of the velocity profiles at the X1 plane, it may be seen that the graph can be split into two parts: the first part characterized by large gradient with high velocities and a second part where the velocity gradient is small

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Though air foam drilling technology has been widely used in drilling oil and gas wells, which has proved its efficiency in numerous situations where serious problems were encountered such as in fractured formations and depleted or high permeable zones, the main challenge is that after returning to the surface the foam remains stable and requires a long period of time to dissipate back to the volume of the original liquid (Teichrob and Manuel, 1997; Cao et al, 2009). A number of mechanical foam breakers have so far been proposed including high rotate centrifugal foam breaker (Vetoshkin, 2003), foambreaking cyclones (Guzman, 2005) and air jet breaker (Vetoshkin and Chagin, 2002), etc., (Satoshi et al, 2003; Takesono et al, 2006; Zagoskina and Sokovnin, 2001; Barigou, 2001; Satoshi et al, 2007; Deshpande and Barigou, 2000) Most of these breakers are hardly practical for foam-breaking operation in high-rate gas bubbling systems of foam drilling fluid. All the walls are considered to be adiabatic with no slip

Results and discussion
Outlet plane
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.