Abstract

The flow field in a rough microchannel is numerically analyzed using a hybrid solver, dynamically coupling kinetic and Navier–Stokes solutions computed in rarefied and continuum subareas of the flow field, respectively, and a full Navier–Stokes solver. The rough surface is configured with triangular roughness elements, with a maximum relative roughness of 5 % of the channel height. The effects of Mach number, Knudsen number (or Reynolds number) and roughness height are investigated and discussed in terms of Poiseuille number and mass flow rate. Discrepancies between full Navier–Stokes and hybrid solutions are analyzed, assessing the range of validity of Navier–Stokes equations provided with first-order slip boundary conditions for modeling gas flow along a rough surface. Results indicate that the roughness increases Poiseuille number and decreases mass flux in comparison with those for the smooth microchannel. Increasing rarefaction results in further enhancement of roughness effect. At the same time, the compressibility effect is more noticeable than the roughness one, although the compressibility effect is alleviated by increase in the rarefaction. It was found that, although the Navier–Stokes solution of the flow in a smooth channel is accurate up to Kn = 0.1, when relative roughness height is higher than 1.25 % significant errors already appear at Kn = 0.02.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.