Abstract

Due to the interaction between branch flow and main stream at confluence zone in open channel, the water level of free surface often varies dramatically. In three dimensional simulations of confluence flow, multi-phase models are usually adopted in treating the free-surface boundary, for example, the Volume of Fluid model. The major dilemma for adopting multi-phase modes is that the method consumes more time and computation resources. In this study, the new mesh technique, the dynamic meshes, is adopted to track the position of free surface. The simulation results show that simulation adopting dynamic meshes converges rapidly and is in good agreement with the experimental data. In addition, simulations and comparisons of different turbulence models coupled with dynamic meshes, rigid lid, or the Volume of Fluid method are carried out to investigate the impact by tracing the free-surface boundary. The simulated position of free surface, velocity distribution, and vector field are all compared to the data collected in the flume test. The results of numerical simulations of confluence flow using the dynamic meshes present much better accuracy than those of Volume of Fluid or rigid-lid method, although they take the same turbulence model.

Highlights

  • The k-ω model is preferable for simulation of confluence flow

  • Several two-equation turbulence models are adopted to consider the influence of turbulence

  • The simulation results show that different surface treating methods impact the simulation accuracy greatly, the same turbulence model is adopted

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Open-channel confluence flow is common in natural rivers and receives intensive interest in environmental and hydraulic engineering. Previous studies have presented detailed descriptions of flow properties in the confluence region, indicating that the distinctive characteristics of confluence flow are the recirculation zone and secondary circumfluence. Several issues affect scales of the separation zone and intensity of the secondary circulation. Best and Reid [22, 23] studied the effects of confluence angle and flow rate ratio between main and tributary channels on the flow structure and bed deformation in the confluence region. Ashmore and Parker [24] and Borghei and Sahebari [25] presented the relationship between flow rate ratio and local scour in the vicinity of confluence. Best and Roy [10], Biron et al [26, 27], Bradbrook et al [28], Rhoads and Sukhodolov [29], and Wang et al [30] pointed out the great importance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call