Abstract

The effects of streams and drainage representation in 3D numerical catchment scale models on estimated streamflow contribution were investigated. MODFLOW-USG was used to represent complex geology and a stream network with two different conceptualizations—one with equal cell discretization in the entire model domain and another with refined cell discretization along stream reaches. Both models were calibrated against a large data set including hydraulic heads and streamflow measurements. Though the optimized hydraulic parameters and statistical performance of both model conceptualizations were comparable, their estimated streamflow contribution differed substantially. In the conceptualization with equal cell discretization, the drainage contribution to the streamflow was 13% compared to 41% in the conceptualization with refined cell discretization. The increase in drainage contribution to streamflow was attributed to the increase in drainage area in proximity to the stream reaches arising from the refined discretization. e.g., the cell refinement along stream reaches reduced the area occupied by stream cells allowing for increased drain area adjacent to the stream reaches. As such, an increase in drainage area equivalent to 7% yielded a 146% increase in drainage contribution to streamflow. In-stream field measurements of groundwater-surface water exchange fluxes that were qualitatively compared to calculated fluxes from the models indicated that estimates from the refined model discretization were more representative. Hence, the results of this study accentuate the importance of being able to represent stream and drain flow contribution correctly, that is, to achieve representative exchange fluxes that are crucial in simulating groundwater–surface water exchange of both flow and solute transport in catchment scale modeling. To that end, the in-stream measurements of exchange fluxes showed the potential to serve as a proxy to numerically estimate drainage contribution that is not readily available at the catchment scale.

Highlights

  • Successful in representing field measurements on the meter scale, sub-catchment models are inadequate for analyzing the impacts of management decisions on, for example, reducing nutrient loading from agricultural land use, which necessarily must be taken on the regional catchment scale

  • The results of this study showed that the discretization used to specify the streams and drainage in their proximity had a substantial impact on simulated flow balance contribution to streamflow

  • As these differences in flow balance contribution lead to differences in exchange fluxes that are crucial in simulating GW-surface water (SW) exchange of flow and nutrients dynamics, it is paramount that future 3D numerical modeling can accurately estimate flow balance contribution to streamflow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For groundwater (GW)–surface water (SW) exchanges, instream and streambed measurements provide valuable information for testing large-scale models that quantify both the magnitude and direction of exchange fluxes and the variability within the meter scale along stream reaches [1,2,3,4]. Such measurements are often not utilized in catchment scale modeling [5], for good reasons. Successful in representing field measurements on the meter scale, sub-catchment models are inadequate for analyzing the impacts of management decisions on, for example, reducing nutrient loading from agricultural land use, which necessarily must be taken on the regional catchment scale

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call