Abstract
This study focuses on optimizing a 100-W-class β-Type Stirling engine by combining the modified thermodynamic model and the variable-step simplified conjugate gradient (VSCGM) method. For the modified thermodynamic model, non-uniform pressure is directly introduced into the energy equation, so the indicated power and heat transfer rates can reach energy balance while the VSCGM is an updated version of the simplified conjugate gradient method (SCGM) with adaptive increments and step lengths to the optimization process; thus, it requires fewer iterations to reach the optimal solution than the SCGM. For the baseline case, the indicated power progressively raises from 88.2 to 210.2 W and the thermal efficiency increases from 34.8 to 46.4% before and after optimization, respectively. The study shows the VSCGM possesses robust property. All optimal results from the VSCGM are well-matched with those of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. Heating temperature and rotation speed have positive effects on optimal engine performance. The optimal indicated power rises linearly with the charged pressure, whereas the optimal thermal efficiency tends to decrease. The study also points out that results of the modified thermodynamic model with fixed values of unknowns agree well with the CFD results at points far from the baseline case.
Highlights
Many configurations of Stirling engines possess dominantly longitudinal variations of temperature and velocity
This study shows that the modified thermodynamic model in the VSCGM optimizer with fixed predicted values of unknown coefficients can generate results wellmatched with those of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model at points far from the baseline case
The compact 100-W-class β-Type Stirling engine was optimized by the combination of the modified thermodynamic model, proposed by Cheng and Phung [17], and the VSCGM, proposed by Cheng and Lin [28]
Summary
Many configurations of Stirling engines possess dominantly longitudinal variations of temperature and velocity. Thermodynamic models consume much less computational time and memory storage than CFD ones. Cheng and Phung [17] proposed a modified thermodynamic model by completely removing the adiabatic condition on expansion and compression chambers and simultaneously introducing non-uniform pressure to the energy equation so cyclic heat transfer rates and cyclic indicated power can balance at the final cycle. This energy balance lays a firm foundation for optimization in this study. There appears no direct application of CFD models for optimizing Stirling engine performance due to these severe limitations
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.