Abstract

This paper reviews the current progress in mathematical modeling of anti-reflective subwavelength structures. Methods covered include effective medium theory (EMT), finite-difference time-domain (FDTD), transfer matrix method (TMM), the Fourier modal method (FMM)/rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) and the finite element method (FEM). Time-based solutions to Maxwell’s equations, such as FDTD, have the benefits of calculating reflectance for multiple wavelengths of light per simulation, but are computationally intensive. Space-discretized methods such as FDTD and FEM output field strength results over the whole geometry and are capable of modeling arbitrary shapes. Frequency-based solutions such as RCWA/FMM and FEM model one wavelength per simulation and are thus able to handle dispersion for regular geometries. Analytical approaches such as TMM are appropriate for very simple thin films. Initial disadvantages such as neglect of dispersion (FDTD), inaccuracy in TM polarization (RCWA), inability to model aperiodic gratings (RCWA), and inaccuracy with metallic materials (FDTD) have been overcome by most modern software. All rigorous numerical methods have accurately predicted the broadband reflection of ideal, graded-index anti-reflective subwavelength structures; ideal structures are tapered nanostructures with periods smaller than the wavelengths of light of interest and lengths that are at least a large portion of the wavelengths considered.

Highlights

  • Recent trends of global climate change and impending petroleum shortages have encouraged researchers to develop a variety of renewable energy production methods, solar electricity generation being among the most popular of solutions

  • This paper addresses the current status of mathematical modeling of anti-reflective sub-wavelength structures (ARSWS), provides the background on the most popular of modeling techniques for ARSWS, and suggests appropriate applications for each technique

  • Only four major modeling methods are commonly used in the field of ARSWS: finite-difference time-domain (FDTD), finite element method (FEM), transfer matrix method (TMM), and rigorous coupled-wave analysis or Fourier modal method (RCWA/FMM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent trends of global climate change and impending petroleum shortages have encouraged researchers to develop a variety of renewable energy production methods, solar electricity generation being among the most popular of solutions. The mathematical approach for each of these methods is different, resulting in different advantages and disadvantages in modeling capabilities, which are the topic of this review These methods are considered accurate and rigorous solutions to Maxwell’s equations, it is suggested that exploration of solutions through multiple modeling methods is most robust [1]. Some optical modeling methods are not covered here; these methods include method of moments (MoM; for background see Chapter 15 in reference [2]) and finite integral technique (FIT). These methods, while popular for other optical modeling applications, have not been used widely to model anti-reflective subwavelength structures, and will not be discussed

Background on Anti-Reflective Sub-Wavelength Structures
Ideal Anti-Reflective Sub-Wavelength Structures and Gradient Indexes
Properties of ARSWS Models
Commercial EM Modeling Software Packages
Utility of Modeling ARSWS
Overview of Optical Modeling Methods
Effective Medium Theory
Time-Based Optical Modeling Methods
Transfer Matrix Method
Finite Element Method
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call