Abstract
This paper presents the results of a comparative study on different finite element modeling approaches for modeling geosynthetic-encased stone column-reinforced ground for use in rapid embankment construction. The specific models considered include: (1) an axisymmetric unit cell; (2) a three-dimensional (3D) column; and (3) a full 3D model. The validity of the unit cell model was tested by comparison with the results from the 3D models. The applicability of continuum elements for modeling the geosynthetic encasement was also investigated. The results show that the 3D column model yielded practically identical results when compared with those of the full 3D model whereas the two-dimensional axisymmetric unit cell model tended to yield results that were 10 to 20% larger in terms of the vertical effective stress and lateral deformation of the stone column. It is also shown that a layer(s) of continuum elements can be used to model the geosynthetic encasement instead of membrane elements which are not readily available in commercial software for geotechnical analysis, provided that the axial stiffness of the geosynthetic encasement is taken into consideration. Based on the results of analysis, the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns installed in soft ground under embankment loading is also discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
